Figure skating changing for the better

HOLLY CULP
Sports Writer

After losing out on the gold medal to American figure skater Evan Lysacek, Russia’s Evgeni Plushenko upgraded his silver medal to “platinum” on his official website.

This is more than just being a sore loser; this comes down to a single element in the world of figure skating: the quadruple jump. Plushenko was quoted after the men’s short program that “if it is not quad, it is not men’s figure skating.”

The quadruple jump was first landed in competition in 1988 by Canada’s very own Kurt Browning. After that, if you were not landing your quad jumps in men’s figure skating, you simply were not winning medals. The fact that the quadruple jump is extremely dangerous for skaters was ignored in favour of proving oneself to the sport.

Under the old scoring system, skaters were awarded points for overall technical merit. Since 2002 and the Sale-Pelletier clusterfuck, the system has changed and so has everything else about the sport.

Before, in the 6.0 system, a skater would be awarded scores for overall technical merit in the freeskate, required elements in the short program, and presentation in both. In this system, your score would likely be pretty high if you happened to land a quadruple jump. More attention was given to technical perfection, especially in jumps.

Since 2002, the idea that the quadruple jump is the equivalent to ultimate dominance in this extremely technical sport is a tired remnant of a fast-declining school of thought.

In the new system, points are awarded individually for each element (an element being a specific jump or spin), so if you include a quadruple jump followed by a triple jump in your program and fuck it up, you’re going to be out about 16 points. On top of that, the program component mark — which includes choreography, interpretation, transitions and footwork — is more precisely marked and important than in the previous system.

If you’re wondering why Plushenko didn’t make the cut, it may have been because Lysacek’s was better artistically and his jumps were better executed. Also, this part of the scoring system saved Canadian Patrick Chan because he had possibly the best choreography in the entire competition but a weaker technical performance.

Another beef I have with Plushenko is that he has been retired for three years, already has his Olympic gold medal and didn’t even practice his routine the morning of the freeskate competition. In the end, Evan Lysacek was more practiced and better suited to win the gold medal. He worked harder than anyone for that medal. He didn’t just show up after a three year hiatus and say, “You know what? I think I’ll compete in the Olympics today!”

There used to be a time when the quad was essential for dominance in male figure skating. There also used to be a time when Russian figure skaters would strike fear in the hearts of skaters all over the world. Both of these things are coming to an end.

The fact is a lot of skaters are not willing to use the quad in competition even if they can land it. It is too dangerous, exhausting and, in the end, probably not worth it. Patrick Chan put it best in his Tiger Woods analogy: “Tiger Woods has a driver in his golf bag, but he doesn’t always use it.” Chan’s belief that the quad gets too much attention and distracts from the artistry of the sport is dead on.

- -


Social Networking

Follow the Sheaf on Twitter, Facebook and YouTube.

, , , ,

  • Casey Edwards

    All sports have progressions. Figure skating has progessed with increased revolutions in jumps. I wonder if this writer would have been anti double jumps or anti triple jumps. The sport is progressing through jumps. The fact that the current olympic champion can’t do quads is devastating and horrible for the sport. Hopefully no man ever wins another competition without a quad. The fact that the scoring was changed not to penalize attempts so harshly will increase quad attempts and keep the sport moving forward.

  • Agata

    1- Plushenko won many competitions with the new score sistem. His tecnical skills on others elements are still the same. Other skaters have improved others elemetes, but deterioreted with jumps. The point is: in this sport, jumps are the most difficult elements.
    2- You wrote, about Laysachek “his jumps were better executed”. Both in short and long programe he did good jumps, but not as good to rich the executions points(GOE) he’s got. Height and wide rotation are the elements that usually increase the execution points of a jump (+1, +2, +3). L. ones were low and their rotations were “just” enogh. This made his GOEs questionable. The extra points he’s got for putting them in second half of the programe, are calculated on their own and I’m not questioning that.
    3- “Lysacek’s was better artistically” doesn’t mean anything. Interpretation is the more questionable thing in universe, but audience around the world (and north american TVs untill yesterday) have always found Plushenko as a great performer. But if we only talk about transitions, footwork and coreography when you said that ” this part of the scoring system saved Canadian Patrick Chan because he had possibly the best choreography in the entire competition but a weaker technical performance” you admit, that BECOUSE they’re not able to have difficult tecnical elements, they try to earn points doing a lot of “easy” things. Those elements should make the difference between programs with the same tecnical level. And it’s not the case: landing a quad (or 4 in combination with a 3) is much more difficult than putting a lot of coreography elements. That’s what Plushenko meant when he said “this is figure skating, not dance”. But in any case, he had great footworks andstep sequenses (and he dind’t fall as Chan did in – the short – doing what he’s suppost to do better).
    4 – “He worked harder than anyone for that medal. He didn’t just show up after a three year hiatus and say, “You know what? I think I’ll compete in the Olympics today!”” If after 3 years of not competing, Plushenko is still able to get back and fighting for a medal, that shows only the great champion he is and how much he has worked in all his life. The shame, is that in these 3 years, skaters haven’t improved. It’s like they said “Thanx to God he’s gone and we can win somenthig without working hard”. The shame is that today he is the only one trying to do those things. When he was 19(and won his first olympic silver medal) he and Yagudin have in both short and long programe 4-3-2 and another 4. And I haven’t seen programs more arstical than their ones…
    But maybe they were “true” champions.

  • Stephanie

    I like how Patrick Chan, of CANADA! said over and over again ‘a quad doesn’t make a man’.

  • Jean

    I like figure skating and I’d like to see men doing more than women in their programs…